<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kutaragi Watch: Cell &#8220;defects&#8221; are just redundancy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://topofcool.com/blog/2005/06/21/kutaragi-watch-cell-defects-are-just-redundancy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://topofcool.com/blog/2005/06/21/kutaragi-watch-cell-defects-are-just-redundancy/</link>
	<description>You are in a maze of twisty passages, all alike.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 15:56:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finster</title>
		<link>http://topofcool.com/blog/2005/06/21/kutaragi-watch-cell-defects-are-just-redundancy/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Finster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topofcool.com/?p=51#comment-35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting. A white paper on G4 production yield published by Motorola. *That&#039;s* objective. They&#039;re doing the same thing that I&#039;m criticizing Kutaragi for.

I&#039;m not arguing whether the technique has been used before or not. But to call this redundancy is to put a positive spin on something that is essentially building for failure. See my RAID comparison above.

But since your comment was both intelligent and backed up by facts, you should get an internet cookie. You&#039;re essentially right, but are arguing against a point I was never making.

But I digress. Obviously, there have to be some acceptable level of defects. I understand that. I realize this has been done with CPU in respect to clock speed for a long long time. But this is probably the first time that I&#039;ve ever heard anyone say, &quot;Look how great this is! A greater percentage of our silicon area is defective, wow! Now go buy a PS3!&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. A white paper on G4 production yield published by Motorola. *That&#8217;s* objective. They&#8217;re doing the same thing that I&#8217;m criticizing Kutaragi for.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not arguing whether the technique has been used before or not. But to call this redundancy is to put a positive spin on something that is essentially building for failure. See my RAID comparison above.</p>
<p>But since your comment was both intelligent and backed up by facts, you should get an internet cookie. You&#8217;re essentially right, but are arguing against a point I was never making.</p>
<p>But I digress. Obviously, there have to be some acceptable level of defects. I understand that. I realize this has been done with CPU in respect to clock speed for a long long time. But this is probably the first time that I&#8217;ve ever heard anyone say, &#8220;Look how great this is! A greater percentage of our silicon area is defective, wow! Now go buy a PS3!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Factory</title>
		<link>http://topofcool.com/blog/2005/06/21/kutaragi-watch-cell-defects-are-just-redundancy/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Factory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 07:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topofcool.com/?p=51#comment-34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Kutaragi&#039;s &quot;creative redefinition&quot; of redundancy means..&quot;
  Wrong!
  Although using redundant CPU cores is prolly a new thing (if only because having multiple cores on a die is a relatively new design technique) the actual technique is used for cache memory and the final cycle rating for CPUs, and has been for a long time.
  In fact here is a paper on cache redundancy from 1999, http://www.iccd-conference.org/proceedings/1999/04060291.pdf]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Kutaragi&#8217;s &#8220;creative redefinition&#8221; of redundancy means..&#8221;<br />
  Wrong!<br />
  Although using redundant CPU cores is prolly a new thing (if only because having multiple cores on a die is a relatively new design technique) the actual technique is used for cache memory and the final cycle rating for CPUs, and has been for a long time.<br />
  In fact here is a paper on cache redundancy from 1999, <a href="http://www.iccd-conference.org/proceedings/1999/04060291.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.iccd-conference.org/proceedings/1999/04060291.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finster</title>
		<link>http://topofcool.com/blog/2005/06/21/kutaragi-watch-cell-defects-are-just-redundancy/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Finster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topofcool.com/?p=51#comment-33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aw, so your apparent luck at not getting boned by buying Sony hardware obviously invalidates everyone else who has ever had a problem.

Silly me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aw, so your apparent luck at not getting boned by buying Sony hardware obviously invalidates everyone else who has ever had a problem.</p>
<p>Silly me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drypulse</title>
		<link>http://topofcool.com/blog/2005/06/21/kutaragi-watch-cell-defects-are-just-redundancy/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[drypulse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topofcool.com/?p=51#comment-32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hehe my ps2 has been on its side since the day xbox came out (so they can both fit where&#039;s i wants them)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hehe my ps2 has been on its side since the day xbox came out (so they can both fit where&#8217;s i wants them)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Man Bytes Blog</title>
		<link>http://topofcool.com/blog/2005/06/21/kutaragi-watch-cell-defects-are-just-redundancy/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Man Bytes Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 08:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topofcool.com/?p=51#comment-36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Carnival of Gamers III&lt;/strong&gt;

Step right up!  Step right up!  Push your way to the front of the line!  Oh sure, there&#8217;s plenty of room but you&#8217;ll want to be able to tell your friends you saw this first!  Welcome, Ladies and Gentlemen, to the Carnival of Gamers III!  We...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Carnival of Gamers III</strong></p>
<p>Step right up!  Step right up!  Push your way to the front of the line!  Oh sure, there&#8217;s plenty of room but you&#8217;ll want to be able to tell your friends you saw this first!  Welcome, Ladies and Gentlemen, to the Carnival of Gamers III!  We&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finster</title>
		<link>http://topofcool.com/blog/2005/06/21/kutaragi-watch-cell-defects-are-just-redundancy/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Finster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 22:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topofcool.com/?p=51#comment-31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congrats. Just don&#039;t ever set the PS2 on its side, and you&#039;ll be fine.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats. Just don&#8217;t ever set the PS2 on its side, and you&#8217;ll be fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drypulse</title>
		<link>http://topofcool.com/blog/2005/06/21/kutaragi-watch-cell-defects-are-just-redundancy/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[drypulse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 17:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topofcool.com/?p=51#comment-30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hmmm, my original ps1 and ps2 both work to this day... oh well, i can jump on anyways.

boo sony!!! yay beer!!!!

fight the machine!!!1!!oneone]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm, my original ps1 and ps2 both work to this day&#8230; oh well, i can jump on anyways.</p>
<p>boo sony!!! yay beer!!!!</p>
<p>fight the machine!!!1!!oneone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
